For the step-by-step guide, if included, it should be minimal, just outlining the general process of using a cracked tool, not providing specific download links or steps, which could be considered promoting piracy.
Now, structuring the report. I should start with an introduction about PST files and the need for repair tools. Then move on to Kernel for Outlook PST Repair 20.3 overview, its features, system requirements, reasons for the crack and subsequent fix. Then a step-by-step guide on using the fixed crack, advantages and disadvantages of using it, legal and ethical considerations, and finally, alternatives to the cracked software.
In the features section, maybe describe the original tool's capabilities, then note that the cracked version purportedly includes the same features. But the user should be cautious when downloading any version from third-party sites, as it could be malicious.